You are here: / Education / Law / Legal History and the History of Law

Legal History and the History of Law

11016829-long-island-lawyers-271x300

American Law: History and Origins

Visit http://study.com for thousands more videos like this one. You’ll get full access to our interactive quizzes and transcripts and can find out how to use our videos to earn real college credit. YouTube hosts only the first few lessons in each course. The rest are at www.study.com. Take the next step in your educational future and graduate with less debt and in less time.
11016829-long-island-lawyersLegal history or the history of law is the study of how law has evolved and why it changed. Legal history is closely connected to the development of civilizations and is set in the wider context of social history. Among certain jurists and historians of legal process it has been seen as the recording of the evolution of laws and the technical explanation of how these laws have evolved with the view of better understanding the origins of various legal concepts, some consider it a branch of intellectual history. Twentieth century historians have viewed legal history in a more contextualized manner more in line with the thinking of social historians. They have looked at legal institutions as complex systems of rules, players and symbols and have seen these elements interact with society to change, adapt, resist or promote certain aspects of civil society. Such legal historians have tended to analyze case histories from the parameters of social science inquiry, using statistical methods, analyzing class distinctions among litigants, petitioners and other players in various legal processes. By analyzing case outcomes, transaction costs, number of settled cases they have begun an analysis of legal institutions, practices, procedures and briefs that give us a more complex picture of law and society than the study of jurisprudencecase law and civil codes can achieve.

Ancient World – Ma’atBabylonian lawAncient Greek law, and Leviticus UrukaginaHittite laws, and Ostracism

Ancient Egyptian law, dating as far back as 3000 BC, had a civil code that was probably broken into twelve books. It was based on the concept of Ma’at, characterised by tradition, rhetorical speech, social equality and impartiality.  By the 22nd century BC, Ur-Nammu, an ancient Sumerian ruler, formulated the first law code, consisting of casuistic statements (“if… then…”). Around 1760 BC, King Hammurabi further developed Babylonian law, by codifying and inscribing it in stone. Hammurabi placed several copies of his law code throughout the kingdom of Babylon as stelae, for the entire public to see; this became known as the Codex Hammurabi. The most intact copy of these stelae was discovered in the 19th century by British Assyriologists, and has since been fully transliterated and translated into various languages, including English, German and French. Ancient Athens, the small Greek city-state, was the first society based on broad inclusion of the citizenry, excluding women and the slave class. Ancient Greek has no word for “law” as an abstract concept, retaining instead the distinction between divine law (thémis), human decree (nomos) and custom (díkē).  Yet Ancient Greek law contained major constitutional innovations in the development of democracy.

Southern Asia – Manu SmritiYajnavalkya SmritiArthashastra, and Dharmasastra Classical Hindu law

Classical Hindu law in practice, and Hindu law

436px-Constitution_of_IndiaAncient India and China represent distinct traditions of law, and had historically independent schools of legal theory and practice. The Arthashastra, dating from the 400 BC, and the Manusmriti from 100 AD were influential treatises in India, texts that were considered authoritative legal guidance.  Manu’s central philosophy was tolerance and pluralism, and was cited across South East Asia.  But this Hindu tradition, along with Islamic law, was supplanted by the common law when India became part of the British Empire.  Malaysia, Brunei, Singapore and Hong Kong also adopted the common law.

Eastern Asia – Traditional Chinese lawTang Code, and Great Qing Legal Code

The eastern Asia legal tradition reflects a unique blend of secular and religious influences.  Japan was the first country to begin modernizing its legal system along western lines, by importing bits of the French, but mostly the German Civil Code.  This partly reflected Germany’s status as a rising power in the late nineteenth century. Similarly, traditional Chinese law gave way to westernization towards the final years of the Ch’ing dynasty in the form of six private law codes based mainly on the Japanese model of German law.  Today Taiwanese law retains the closest affinity to the codifications from that period, because of the split between Chiang Kai-shek‘s nationalists, who fled there, and Mao Zedong‘s communists who won control of the mainland in 1949. The current legal infrastructure in the People’s Republic of China was heavily influenced by soviet Socialist law, which essentially inflates administrative law at the expense of private law rights.  Today, however, because of rapid industrialization China has been reforming, at least in terms of economic (if not social and political) rights. A new contract code in 1999 represented a turn away from administrative domination. Furthermore, after negotiations lasting fifteen years, in 2001 China joined the World Trade Organization.

Yassa of the Mongol Empire

circa. 1876-1877 Antique Law BooksIslamic: ShariaFiqhIslamic ethics, and Early reforms under Islam

One of the major legal systems developed during the Middle Ages was Islamic law and jurisprudence. A number of important legal institutions were developed by Islamic jurists during the classical period of Islamic law and jurisprudence, One such institution was the Hawala, an early informal value transfer system, which is mentioned in texts of Islamic jurisprudence as early as the 8th century. Hawala itself later influenced the development of the Aval in French civil law and the Avallo in Italian law.

European Laws: Roman Empire – Roman Law

Roman law was heavily influenced by Greek teachings.  It forms the bridge to the modern legal world, over the centuries between the rise and decline of the Roman Empire.  Roman law, in the days of the Roman republic and Empire, was heavily procedural and there was no professional legal class.  Instead a lay person, iudex, was chosen to adjudicate. Precedents were not reported, so any case law that developed was disguised and almost unrecognised.  Each case was to be decided afresh from the laws of the state, which mirrors the (theoretical) unimportance of judges’ decisions for future cases in civil law systems today. During the 6th century AD in the Eastern Roman Empire, the Emperor Justinian codified and consolidated the laws that had existed in Rome so that what remained was one twentieth of the mass of legal texts from before.  This became known as the Corpus Juris Civilis. As one legal historian wrote, “Justinian consciously looked back to the golden age of Roman law and aimed to restore it to the peak it had reached three centuries before.”

Middle Ages

Joao_sem_terra_assina_carta_MagnaKing John of England signs the Magna Carta: Early Germanic lawAnglo-Saxon law, and Lex mercatoriaGermanic tribal lawsVisigothic CodeDōmBlutgerichtMagna Carta, and Schwabenspiegel

During the Byzantine Empire the Justinian Code was expanded and remained in force until the Empire fell, though it was never officially introduced to the West. Instead, following the fall of the Western Empire and in former Roman countries, the ruling classes relied on the Theodosian Code to govern natives and Germanic customary law for the Germanic incomers – a system known as folk-right – until the two laws blended together. Since the Roman court system had broken down, legal disputes were adjudicated according to Germanic custom by assemblies of lrned lawspeakers in rigid ceremonies and in oral proceedings that relied heavily on testimony. After much of the West was consolidated under Charlemagne, law became centralised so as to strengthen the royal court system, and consequently case law, and abolished folk-right. However, once Charlemagne’s kingdom definitively splintered, Europe became feudalistic, and law was generally not governed above the county, municipal or lordship level, thereby creating a highly decentralised legal culture that favored the development of customary law founded on localized case law. However, in the 11th century, Crusaders, having pillaged the Byzantine Empire, returned with Byzantine legal texts including the Justinian Code, and scholars at the University of Bologna were the first to use them to interpret their own customary laws.  Mediaeval European legal scholars began researching the Roman law and using its concepts and prepared the way for the partial resurrection of Roman law as the modern civil law in a large part of the world.  There was, however, a great deal of resistance so that civil law rivaled customary law for much of the late Middle Ages. After the Norman conquest of England, which introduced Norman legal concepts into mediaeval England, the English King’s powerful judges developed a body of precedent that became the common law.  In particular, Henry II instituted legal reforms and developed a system of royal courts administered by a small number of judges who lived in Westminster and traveled throughout the kingdom.  Henry II also instituted the Assize of Clarendon in 1166, which allowed for jury trials and reduced the number of trials by combatLouis IX of France also undertook major legal reforms and, inspired by ecclesiastical court procedure, extended Canon-law evidence and inquisitorial-trial systems to the royal courts. Also, judges no longer moved on circuits becoming fixed to their jurisdictions, and jurors were nominated by parties to the legal dispute rather than by the sheriff.  In addition, by the 10th century, the Law Merchant, first founded on Scandinavian trade customs, then solidified by the Hanseatic League, took shape so that merchants could trade using familiar standards, rather than the many splintered types of local law. A precursor to modern commercial law, the Law Merchant emphasised the freedom of contract and alienability of property.

brooklyn-lawyers2Modern European Law: Napoleonic codeBürgerliches Gesetzbuch, and English law

The two main traditions of modern European law are the codified legal systems of most of continental Europe, and the English tradition based on case law.

As nationalism grew in the 18th and 19th centuries, lex mercatoria was incorporated into countries’ local law under new civil codes. Of these, the French Napoleonic Code and the German Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch became the most influential. As opposed to English common law, which consists of massive tomes of case law, codes in small books are easy to export and for judges to apply. However, today there are signs that civil and common law are converging. European Union law is codified in treaties, but develops through the precedent set down by the European Court of Justice.

United State

The United States legal system developed primarily out of the English common law system (with the exception of the state of Louisiana, which continued to follow the French civilian system after being admitted to statehood). Some concepts from Spanish law, such as the prior appropriation doctrine and community property, still persist in some U.S. states, particularly those that were part of the Mexican Cession in 1848.

Under the doctrine of federalism, each state has its own separate court system, and the ability to legislate within areas not reserved to the federal government.

http://study.com/academy/subj/history.html

PureHistory
PureHistory.org ℗ is your source to learn about the broad and beautiful spectrum of our shared History.